Recovering the costs of the Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS)
Executive summary
AAT strongly supports the UK’s drive to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. AAT also recognises that establishing a consistent, robust anti-money laundering supervisory regime in the UK is of paramount importance.
We support the decision to retain the minimum fee threshold. AAT considers that the tariff measure of supervised individuals remains the most suitable, and that 6,000 supervised individuals is a reasonable point at which to set the minimum fee threshold. Retaining a threshold mitigates the potential unfairness of a methodology based on a supervised population.
The basis for the OPBAS running costs figure, used to arrive at the fee level under consultation, remains unclear. AAT acknowledges that being able to take account of actual expenditure has enabled a reduction in the forecast running costs for 2019/20 and the AFR but believes much more could be done to explain its costs.
Related consultation responses
Improving the effectiveness of the Money Laundering Regulations
AAT supports the government’s drive to combat money laundering and terrorist financing and to ensure that UK businesses are appropriately supported.
Spring Budget 2024 representation
This representation ahead of the March 2024 Spring Budget sets out AAT’s policy position on tax, professional standards, support for SMEs and late payments.
Reforming anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing supervision
AAT contends that the OPBAS+ model is the most suitable option and would result in a demonstrable improvement in the sector.